In order to develop the Theory of the Unified Field
we are going to use a methodology which must be explained carefully.
Heterogeneity of matter, that is to say, we assume
that matter is completely heterogeneous as persons and objects of the Nature
are different.
Matter in fact, physical properties are very
different inside crystals being apparently homogeneous. For example, in
crystals divided in domains (ferromagnetic, ferroelectric, superconductor,…)
different physical properties corresponding to domains of crystals are
observed.
Liquids and gases present a shells structure
associated to distribution densities.
Stechiometry does not exist even at local level.
In similar form, the same heterogeneity in the Universe is observed: Galaxies
and regions of our galaxy or our Solar System are very heterogeneous.
Any process of the Nature is a transformation.
That is to say, if an observer studies some process of the Nature and he is
solidary with physical objects, then he must observe changes in physical
parameters such as electrical conductivity and plasma frequency of objects.
Nothing happen at random. We do not understand
what is hazard and chaos. Anything
responds to a Physical Law and for that reason we accept the validity of the
Science. In this way, the aim of the Science is to predict how processes must
evolve.
The tendency of the Nature is not disorder but
self-organization. For example, a whole of rotors, being weekly coupled, become
to be synchronized if a sufficient time is waited.
Planets of the Solar System are synchronized and solar spots are associated to a
groupment of planets in a side of the Ecliptics.
Order and disorder do not exist. Both terms
involve cultural prejudices with respect to behavior of the Nature. Although
sometimes we can not understand behavior of the Nature, we can not disqualify
it. In fact, any disqualification of behavior of the Nature is a projection of
our valuation about Laws of the Nature and of our role in it.
We can not confound unpredictability with
indeterminism. If we assume unpredictability, we accept ignorance but if
we assume indeterminism, we consider the Nature does not have Laws.
Any process includes results. Results are
joined to processes and they can not be analyzed out of processes.
We can not confound determinism with predestination
because if results are joined to processes, obviously such results depend of
how processes are carried out.
Since quantity of energy is finite, any process
of the Nature last for a finite time, if we speak on temporal terms.
If our methodology of work is to look for general conclusions
from particular conclusions and we use the
analytical method, we have to take into account that analytical method can
drive to wicked conclusions because when isolate objects to be analyzed ,
we can forget the unity in front of the individuality.
We have to start from the Unity
and from the Unity we can establish an individualization or identification
method of processes and objects analyzed .
Validity of Causality Principle is uncertain because objectivity of
spatial and temporal coordinates is assumed. For example, the problem of the
hen and egg: Who was the first?
Suitable methodology is to look
for correspondences in the Nature supported on association categories which
permit to establish relations among all identified physical objects.
Any Physical Theory must accomplish three conditions
simplicity : to be understood by all people
efficiency : to be useful in the life to obtain
a lot of practical results
unification: to be able of explain and include all knowledge of
this cultural period and to integrate all leaving
beings .If Physical Theories include human being, it must solve
problems of the life and to contribute to the her spiritual
evolution.
Science just learns of the Nature and if we work without prejudices we
would understand that any process carried out in the Nature always needs the
minimum quantity of energy, that is to say : simplicity, efficiency and
unification.
Index of publications
